点评：毫无悬念的MBB成为北美地区最具声望的咨询公司Top3（好多好多年了…），而Big4血统的咨询公司仍然延续着过去几年的强势，考虑埃森哲（原安达信咨询），IBM GBS（原PWC咨询），10占其6。

点评：毕业小朋友们最憧憬的”高大上“的战略咨询，在北美区毫无悬念…

点评：整体还是MBB PK Big4，偶尔有几个Tier 2刷刷存在感…

点评：IT咨询领域，IBM最近比较动荡…貌似和A记的分差在拉大，不知道认知计算的战略是不是可以帮大象重夺第一？Booz Allen Hamilton国内见的比较少，但是在米帝是政府的主要IT承包商…把米帝的互联网监控捅出来的爱德华·斯诺登就是该公司的雇员。

点评：唯一的意外是Hay居然在北美的人力资源咨询细分市场掉出了前5…

点评：看到了罗兰贝格的回归，相较于北美地区的业务迟迟打不开局面，作为自身大本营的欧洲地区还是稳居在最具声望的咨询公司之列。而Big4在欧洲的咨询声望与北美还是存在一定的差距。当然MBB还是MBB…

点评：同样作为少数几个源自欧洲的战略咨询公司，罗兰贝格在欧洲地区获得了仅次于MBB的认可程度。水房有两个战略咨询业务线入围…说好的无缝整合呢？

点评：BCG压过了MCK获得了欧洲最佳管理咨询公司…大概是因为其在MBB中最良好的lifestyle风格比较受欧洲人待见？

点评：另一家源自欧洲的咨询公司，凯捷进入本领域的前3。IBM还是很郁闷的看着ACN登顶。话说，MCK在IT咨询领域搞这么高的排名是闹哪样…是BTO的功劳么？

点评：第五名，小编真的念不出啊…皇上

点评：又是MBB…和Big4…为嘛要说又？

点评：亚洲人民相当认可埃森哲的战略咨询能力…这是什么鬼…不过A记战略业务最近倒是挖人蛮凶的。

点评：无

点评：印度同学很厉害的在亚太区域挤进了两家…Tata & Infosys

点评：传统的四大人力咨询公司终于都进前5了…

最具声望的咨询公司的排名方法（来自Vault）：

Survey respondents were asked to rate each consulting firm in the survey on a scale from 1 to 10 based on prestige, with 10 being the most prestigious. Consultants were unable to rate their own firm, and they were asked to rate only those firms with which they were familiar.

Vault collected the survey results and averaged the score for each firm. The firms were then ranked, with the highest score being No. 1, down to No. 50.

Remember that Vault’s top-50 prestigious consulting firms are chosen by practicing consultants at top consulting firms. Vault does not choose or influence these rankings. The rankings measure perceived prestige (as determined by consulting professionals) and not revenue, size or lifestyle.

各个细分行业排名方法（来自Vault）：

Vault asked consultants to rank the best firms in several areas of business focus. Consultants were allowed to vote for up to three firms as the best in each area, but could NOT vote for their own firm.

via：智选堂